





Afghanistan’s Tolo TV is facing harsh criticism from the culture ministry and senior Muslim clerics after broadcasting a Shakira concert chock full of dangerous gyrations:
State television broadcast interviews with clerics and MPs criticising the concert while one pro-government newspaper attacked the “notorious” broadcast of a “naked US pop singer and dancer” claiming it provided inspiration to suicide bombers.
Expand on that thought, please:
“We believe Shakira’s song will be shown with Tolo TV’s exclusive logo at the training camps for suicide attackers to urge our immature young people to leave a number of our mothers bereaved,” said the Weesa newspaper.
Juanes has that precise effect on us, actually. However, not everyone is morally outraged over Shakira’s truthful hips of doom:
Meanwhile, opinion on the streets of Kabul is divided over the Shakira broadcast. “Her clothes were very tight,” said Sharif, a 41-year-old doorman who watched the concert. “Religious people say it is the West trying to impose their values but I had no problem with it.”
Nor do we, Sharif. Nor do we.
Shakira broadcast sparks row in Afghanistan [Telegraph]

I don’t doubt the story in a post-Taliban world still fighting the Taliban there. But, it seems MUCH more likely the context was meant in a way to say terrorists could use this in training and say, “This is what the West wants to do with our women and put them on display.”
Which, of course, is what we want. That’s why we wine about the veils so much here.
Posted by Rich Vazquez | November 25, 2007