Comments on: The Many Sides Of Matt Sanchez: An Interview With A Gay Porn Star Turned Right-Wing Pundit

By: Salima

Salima — Sun, 13 Apr 2008 08:52:03 +0000

This is HOW to interview a porn star:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4OtBHIoZtI

By: Matt Sanchez

Matt Sanchez — Sat, 12 Apr 2008 08:07:36 +0000

It’s too bad much of my original comments were cut out.

By: Escobar Loves Matt Sanchez

Escobar Loves Matt Sanchez — Sat, 12 Apr 2008 07:57:35 +0000

Jee Escobar, sounds like this is not the first Matt Sanchez article you’ve commented on.

By: escobar

escobar — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:08:29 +0000

Wow, this guy is really a tool! Maybe an eight-inch one, but an annoying tool nonetheless.

I think the best thing we can do is not mention his name anymore; he seems to be one of those touched-by-an-a-holes who thrives on any kind of publicity…the leeches of our current media free-for-all (of which my delightful Guanabeeyatches are divinely excluded, as they rise above the seedy pack o’ bottom feeders). And speaking of bottom feeders, Matt Pornchez better clean off that moronic tongue of his before I even think of letting it near THIS bottom!

By: whateva

whateva — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:28:24 +0000

This dude joined the marines in his mid 30’s, a very late age to join the service, and was trained as some sort of mechanic. I don’t think he saw any action, he didn’t fight in any war. Hardly a soldier or a veteran. I love how he played his very brief, unusual, and less-than-stellar military career to get into GS. I’m glad I graduated from Columbia before all the veterans started pouring in. Although I must say, I had a Desert Storm veteran in two of my literature classes and the professors kept ignoring and downplaying all of his comments in class, the bias was very anti-military there. I wonder how it’s working out now. Columbia lowered its standards to admit someone who’s shtick, being in the military, is itself the product of the Marine Corps lowering its standards. Bravo.

By: El Bulto

El Bulto — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 01:10:37 +0000

@Quintana: I thought that was the beauty and genius of Latino people. How does Matt get all the credit?

By: Quintana

Quintana — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:08:19 +0000

The beauty and genius of Matt Sanchez (besides that tasty black and white photo) is that you’re all arguing over the term “Puerto Rican American” and not about the fact that beneath that bad George Clooney haircut is the brain of someone who’s been mixing diet soda with prescription cough syrup since grade school.

By: La Cindy

La Cindy — Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:12:48 +0000

@Lolita: It was meant to convey that he was born in the upper 50. But, thanks.

@ Boricon: Also, suck it. And educate thyself.

By: Boricon

Boricon — Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:01:51 +0000

“Puerto Rican American”? Dude. That’s redundant. Puerto Rico is part of the United States. You wouldn’t say “Nevadan American” would you?

Oh, right. My bad. You probably would.

By: Janie A Go-Go

Janie A Go-Go — Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:56:45 +0000

@ Marco. Don’t you know that you are supposed to find out what side your TA’s cuchifrito leans to?
That information will make you head of the class in no time.

By: Lolita

Lolita — Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:44:21 +0000

Quick friendly FYI…using the term “Puerto Rican American” as you did in the beginning of this piece, is redundant. All Puerto Ricans (whether born stateside or on the island) are American citizens. It’s called the Jones Act of 1917 which made the island an incorporated territory and all people living there U.S. citizens.

By: Marco

Marco — Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:08:14 +0000

While I truthfully didn’t finish reading this because I got bored, its true to say Che and Fidel aren’t heroes, but not true to say Pinochet was no dictator. I put Fidel and Pinochet in the same “terrible people” boat.

That said, speaking of liberal bias, I received a lower-than-deserved grade on an exam at Columbia for arguing that Chileans are, in the end better for Pinochet than Cubans are for Castro. Everyone who said the opposite? A+. Guess most of college is about predicting the political leanings on your TA.