





Naomi Campbell has reportedly undergone surgery that would make her able to have children. Isn’t there some law against this sort of thing?:
Says the model: “Now [that] I can have a child I would like one. I’m even willing to have one without a father. I know that I am ready.”
Weird! And then the article gets, well. Even weirder:
One wonders how Campbell has been altered to be able to bare children, and if Thomas Beatie has been an inspiration. Might Campbell have been man all along, a sex shocker unrivalled by even Noel Edmonds’ more generous bottom and Anthea Turner’s rumoured love of intimate scratching.
One what wonders? Thomas Beatie continues to confound us today.
Says Campbell:”I know that with a baby I would change, I’d calm down. With a child you cannot accept compromises.”
Compromises like, say, instead of setting a puppy on fire, one can just sort of pinch it a little. On the other hand, a little Hugomi baby might be kind of cute, no? We think so! Ponder that as you enjoy this completely unrelated photo of a chupacabra.

Wait. Did she have endometriosis and the surgery was to treat it? If so, that is rather common. Why didn’t she just admit that instead of having the whole world wonder if she had a pee-pee?
Posted by Latin_Princess | June 09, 2008
hey Nay-nay: remember, children are a precious little treasure and are a big responsibility. that said: they kinda aren’t very aerodynamic so think wisely.
kthx!!1! bai!!1!
Posted by el smrtmnky | June 09, 2008
oh she a man! with a big schlong.. woo-hoo!!
I did read however, she went to another country to have an ovarian cyst removed.
Posted by oo-ha | June 10, 2008