A WSJ (Has every news source turned into some sort of fucking blog? Jesus Christ.) reporter covered a fashion show held at the ginormous Mall of the Americas and attempted to turn the event into a discussion on Republican versus Democratic fashion. Luckily, the Republican women in attendance weren’t biting and met the reporter’s questions on “Who dresses better, Hillary or Sarah?” with a quizzical look and a vague response. Because, seriously? Fuck you:

Why does it matter what female politicians are wearing? Or who dresses better than whom? Or if Sarah Palin is “hotter than Tina Fey?” Does anyone know who makes Barack’s suits? Or McCain’s ties? Or Joe Biden’s crotchless panties? And why do people insist on comparing Sarah Palin to Hillary Clinton as if both women are running for the same position? The only things these women have in common are the possession of a vagina and the unenviable position of being women in power dissected by the media.

The idea of “Republican fashion” is also completely beyond us. The footage shows overly-made up women in fancy suits posing alongside bare-faced women with Mommy haircuts. Because, surprise! Political parties are made up of people. And people happen to look very different from one another, often choosing their outfits with no thought as to their political orientation. God, we’re so annoyed. We just want to snuggle up in fashion show MC Lisa Rinna’s lips and take a long nap.

Also, Mr. Reporter? Dear, it’s Oscar de la Renta. With an A. But, of course, how would you be expected to know this given that “women are into fashion” and “men are into cars.” Jerk.

We are loving your log cabin Republican flannel though. Hot.

GOP Women on Palin’s Fashion [WSJ]