





Remember that dog in Alabama that found a little baby foot? Sure you do. Well it turns out the foot in question might have once been firmly attached to a baby bear. Easy mistake:
But Police Chief Chris Hargett said forensics tests confirmed the object was most likely the paw of a young bear. He said the paw was similar enough to a human foot to fool an orthopedic surgeon who examined it and believed it belonged to a youngster.
“The great thing is it’s not a child,” he said. “The most unusual thing is that we’ve never heard of bears being in Russellville.”
Mmhmm. Bear, child. Unidentified creature of some sort. You know what this means, of course. Somewhere in Alabama there is an extremely irate chupacabra, who is a-thinkin’ he should have stayed put in Texas.
Severed Foot Believed to Belong to Child Actually From Baby Bear [Fox]
Earlier: Dog In Alabama Brings Home A Baby’s Severed Foot
[Image]

I have the same problem. My orthopedist says I have bear feet, urologist says I’m hung like a horse,
neurologist says I have six personalities for the price of one, and charges my health plan accordingly. When I visit my mind reader, I get half-price. So it all balances out.
Posted by Nelson Denis | September 26, 2008
Ok, there’s no way I can top Nelson Denis’ post. I’m not even going to try. Lmao.
Posted by Key | September 26, 2008
LOL good work Nelson
Posted by Mike | September 27, 2008
i guess courses in biological anthropology are not required to get your surgeoning license
Posted by chiri | September 27, 2008